charities bill - submission points on issues affecting Maori
24 May 2004
|
The deadline of Thursday 3 June 2004 for submissions on the Charities Bill to Select Committee is looming.
At first glance the Bill seems straight forward but as you will see below there area plethora of issues.
To assist you with drafting your submission we have collated some of the key points on how the legislation will affect Maori interests.
1. Bloodties & Charitable Status
In the past, the fact that a group is joined by bloodties would deny the group charitable status, regardless of whether the activities and purpose of the group are charitable. This is no longer the case under clause 4(3)(a) of the Bill.
On the otherhand however, the organisation must be run maintained exclusively for a charitable purpose. Although this is left up to common law to define, it will no doubt be a strict test. With a stricter reporting regime (annual returns etc)and vetting by the Commission, an entity may have charitable status one year and see it taken off them the next.
A marae
This has ramifications for Maori Authorities seeking charitable status that engage in both charitable activities (education grants etc) and provide dividends to owners. The latter would probably be judged pecuniary profit to an individual, which is not allowed under the Bill. Thus would compromise their charitable status, resulting in deregistering.
There is no guideline in the Bill as to how much information is required for registering a charity and the time it will take.
The Bill provides that a charitable entity must display their registration number. According to the Bill this could mean on every piece of documentation. The rationale for this is that it gives the public the ability to check the charity by way of its registration number. Basically this provision is too wide and needs to be restricted.
There is an introduction of new penalties and new regime of transferring responsibility onto trustees for offences. TRUSTEES CANNOT SEEK INDEMNITY INSURANCE.
The issue is how will this impact on the charities sector? Are there likely to be less charities because of it and for Maori authorities especially those that are statutory bodies with charitable status.
The planned Commission will be a crown entity; essentially crown entities must give effect to government policy at the end of the day. The problem is that the commission serves two purposes, the first one as a regulator and the second one as an advisor to the charities sector. These two roles are obviously at conflict.
Another issue is that the commission is to be funded by the charities sector so you would think there has to be some benefit for the sector – will be difficult considering the nature of a crown entity, need to have a body that is autonomous.
Something to think about:
Organisations can carry out commercial activities as long as money is distributed for charitable purposes – how does this affect Maori Authorities as most give out education grants and the like but also make dividend payments to shareholders. |

